Sam on portfolio ‘snub’
September 7th, 2010 | Published in Road Forward
SASCOC president Gideon Sam on Tuesday played down reports saying the country’s Olympic governing body had snubbed Parliament’s sport portfolio body.
Sapa reports on Tuesday said that SASCOC refused to appear before the committee on Tuesday to answer questions on the report’s findings on the Caster Semenya affair, raising the ire of MPs, including committee chairperson Butana Komphela, who said the body had “snubbed” the committee and shown “arrogance”.
The SA Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) took control of Athletics South Africa and suspended its board, including boss Leonard Chuene, last November for the duration of the forensic audit. MP’s heard on Tuesday that Chuene committed “gross misconduct” by allowing Semenya to run in a world championship race in Berlin in August last year.
Explaining SASCOC’s absence, Sam said: “The SASCOC Board felt that if the matter was that of Athletics South Africa then we did not see it fit to report on a matter that we believe is now sub-judice. We have reported fully to our Minister. Also, the interim Board of ASA, with our Board member Mr. Ray Mali, appeared before the portfolio committee to give an update on the matter.
“We have no reason to undermine the committee but we think flying to Cape Town would be too much.”
Sport and Recreation Minister Makhenkesi Stofile, who was briefing the sport portfolio committee on the results of a forensic report into ASA’s finances and its handling of the Semenya affair, said it was found Chuene had defied all the medical advice he received on Semenya before her 800m race. “They advised that this lady should not run, because it was going to create a psychological problem for her to run and be queried,” Stofile said.
ASA’s doctor Harold Adams, who also served on the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) committee on health and medicine, had advised Chuene that Semenya be withdrawn from the race.
“The report found that Mr Chuene ignored that professional advice and went ahead. “As such, they accuse him of gross misconduct as well as bringing ASA and the sport of athletics and SASCOC into disrepute. He must face disciplinary hearings,” Stofile said.
“It was a rude invasion into the privacy of a young lady and a rude violation of her rights,” Stofile said.
Semenya, who was cleared to run again by the IAAF in July after the findings of an expert medical panel, had not participated competitively in athletics since undergoing gender tests at the Berlin world championships.
The report, Stofile said, had found that ASA’s board members were “just as guilty”, because of their “vote of confidence in Mr Chuene”.
The report contained “various allegations” against the board, including mismanaging the assets of ASA with respect to payments to individuals, per diems and allowances, tax evasion and non-compliance with the Companies Act.
“Those are the things I suppose they say are sensitive, because they must be tested in court,” Stofile said.
SASCOC laid charges against certain individuals from ASA in August, as recommended in the forensic report. Eight ASA board members, including Chuene, were suspended last November.
Stofile said due process had to be followed before SASCOC answered questions on the report. “What needs to be done is for due process to take place and for those things to be tested in court,” he said.
The positive that had come out of the debacle was that “a new benchmark” on testosterone levels had been set for women’s athletics. “Scientists have now laid a benchmark for the world on what constitutes fairness and gender equity for sport,” he said.
















