SASCOC’s 2012 Olympic Games policy

SIGNED SPORTS POLICIES BETWEEN FEDERATIONS & SASCOC

 Archery OG         Athletics OG             Aquatics OG          Badminton OG           Boxing OG         

Canoeing OG         Cycling OG           Equestrian OG        Fencing OG            Football OG      

Gymnastics OG       Hockey OG            Judo OG         Rowing OG                                                   

 Shooting OG          Taekwondo OG         Tennis OG               Triathlon OG                                    

Volleyball OG         Weightlifting OG               Wrestling OG                                      

 South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (Download PDF here)
POLICY AND GENERAL SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES LONDON 2012
The national debate and discussion on representation of our sports teams in
international competitions has prompted SASCOC to reiterate its policy on team
selection. From its foundation in 2004 SASCOC made it clear that South African
Sport Federations needed to accelerate the development of the historically
disadvantaged sector so that South Africa’s sport teams are representative of the
country’ s demography.
Until recently the IOC, working in conjunction with the International Sports
Federations (IFs), had a defined qualification criteria for each sport on the Olympic
Programme. However, the National Olympic Committees (NOCs) from the
developing worlds argued that such criteria would seriously restrict the entry of
participants from their respective countries. In effect the qualification criteria will
disqualify most developing countries from entering competitors in the Olympic
Games. It was stated that many countries would be forced to send only their flagbearers
who would take part in the opening and closing ceremonies.
Qualification for the Olympic Games now takes place via established standard
measures which include times, distance, heights, rankings and elimination
tournaments. These criteria are effected at worldwide and at continental elimination
competitions for National Olympic Committees. The IOC policy, therefore, now caters
for both quality and universality. Quality will ensure that the world’s best athletes
participate in the Olympic Games while Universality would guarantee that there is
adequate representation at the Olympic Games from all countries and provide the
inspiration and opportunity to developing athletes for greater performances.
South Africa, being a member of the African continent, is eligible to enter via general
international qualification competitions and also through continental elimination
tournaments. It is a well-known fact that many Olympic sports in Africa are still at the
development stage, whereas others enjoy an extremely high standard. This poses a
serious dilemma for SASCOC.
South Africa’s sport is highly developed; but because of inequities of apartheid, many
of these sports are still dominated by one sector of the population. It would be easy
to exploit the Olympic qualification system and thus dominate continental
representation but this would be cynical and even dishonest and it would, in our view,
go against the spirit of the IOC’s policy of universality.
It would mean that only one section of our population would dominate our National
Olympic Team under the dubious banner of “merit” and the majority of our team
would come from exclusive sports bodies. We respect the IOC policy with regard to
universality and widespread participation. However this is there for those countries
that do not qualify athletes for the Games, which is not so in our case and therefore
the route of universality should not apply for us.
This will ensure quality selection and will not, in any way, restrict high level
competition. It is high time we remove the cloak of hypocrisy and examine issues
honestly. We will guarantee a place for any athlete who is a probable medal hope or
will return commendable performances. This will be in line with our drive towards 12
by 2012.
In effect, the SASCOC selection policy for the Olympic Games will still respect the
IOC policy.
And always at the back of our minds will be the quote from the Olympic Charter.
“The goal of Olympism is to place everywhere sport at the service of the
harmonious development of man, with a view to encouraging the
establishment of a peaceful society concerned with the preservation of human
dignity.”
RELEVANT EXTRACTS FROM THE OLYMPIC CHARTER:
Rule 28-Mission and Role of NOC’s
Paragraph 3:
The NOCs have the exclusive authority for the representation of their
respective countries at the Olympic Games and at the regional,
continental or world multi-sports competitions patronised by the IOC. In
addition, each NOC is obliged to participate in the Games of the Olympiad
by sending athletes.
Bye –Law of rules 28 and 29
2. NOC’s task:
The NOC’s perform the following tasks:
2.1 They constitute, organise and lead their respective delegations at the Olympic
Games and at the regional, continental or world multi-sports competitions
patronized by the IOC. They decide upon the entry of athletes proposed by
their respective national federations. Such selection shall be based not only
on the sports performance of an athlete but also on his ability to serve as an
example to the sporting youth of his country. The NOCs must ensure that the
entries proposed by the national federations comply in all respects with the
provisions of the Olympic Charter.
PARTICIPATION IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES
Rule 41- Eligibility Code
To be eligible for participation in the Olympic Games a competitor, coach, trainer
or other team official must comply with the Olympic Charter as well as with the
rules of the IF concerned as approved by the IOC, and the competitors, coach,
trainer or other team official must be entered by his/ her NOC
The above mentioned persons must notably:
• Respect the spirit of fair play and non violence, and behave accordingly;
and
• Respect and comply in all aspects with the World Anti- Doping Code.
Bye –Law to Rule 41
1. Each IF establishes its sports own eligibility criteria in accordance with the
Olympic Charter. Such Criteria must be submitted to the IOC Executive Board
for approval.
2. The application of the eligibility criteria lies with the IFs, their affiliated national
federations and the NOCs in the fields of their respective responsibilities.
3. Except as permitted by the IOC Executive Board, no competitors, coach,
trainer or official who participates in the Olympic Games may allow his/her
person , name, picture or sports performances to be used for advertising
purposes during the Olympic Games.
4. The entry or participation of a competitor in the Olympic Games shall not be
conditional on any financial consideration.
Rule 45- Invitations and Entries
1. The invitations to take part in the Olympic Games shall be sent out by the IOC
to all NOCs one year before the opening ceremony.
2. Only NOCs recognised by the IOC may enter competitions in the Olympic
Games. Any entry is subject to acceptance by the IOC, which may at its
discretion, at any time, refuse any entry, without indication of grounds.
Nobody is entitled to any right of any kind to participate in the Olympic
Games.
3. An NOC shall only enter competitor upon recommendations for entries given
by national federation. If the NOC approves thereof, it shall transmit such
entries to the OCOG. The OCOG must acknowledge their receipt. NOCs
must investigate the validity of the entries proposed by the national
federations and ensure that no one has been excluded for racial, religious or
political reasons or by reasons for other forms of discrimination.
4. The NOCs shall send to the Olympic Games only those competitors
adequately prepared for high level international competition. Through its IF, a
national federation may ask that the IOC Executive Board to review a
decision by an NOC in a matter of entries. The IOC Executive Boards
decision shall be final.
Bye-Law to Rule 47
6. Qualification Events Organised by the IFs:
6.1 For certain sports, the IFs (International Federations) may organise qualifying
event or otherwise establish a limited participation in order to designate the
competitors, particularly teams in team sports, who will take part in the
Olympic Games.
6.2 The systems of restrictions and of qualifying events are subject to the
provisions of the Olympic Charter to the extent decided upon by the IOC
Executive Board. The Formula for qualification must be submitted to the IOC
Executive Boards for qualifying events organised by the IFs.
IOC POLICY IN ESTABLISHING QUALIFICATION CRITERIA
AND ENTRIES FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES
The IOC, in co-operation with ANOC (Association of National Olympic Committees)
and the IFs) international Federations), has established qualifications and entry
criteria to ensure the preservation of quality and universality at the Olympic Games.
Quality will ensure that all the top athletes and teams will have adequate
opportunities to qualify and gain the highest positions possible at the Olympic
Games. At the same time, the IOC, ANOC and the IFs are determined that there is
worldwide representation at the Olympic Games. This policy, generally termed
“universality” guarantees the adequate and acceptable possibility of the development
of Olympic Sports in all parts of the world. The reason for continental qualification
and representation is the direct result of this policy. In short, the IOC entry
qualification ensures a two-tiered qualification.
SASCOC’s SELECTION POLICY
SASCOC’s Olympic Selection Policy complies with the letter and spirit of the IOC
Qualification Criteria.
However, SASCOC contends that it will not be fulfilling the IOC criteria if it utilises its
continental qualification as entry for the Olympic Games for individuals and teams
from the former establishment sector of the population. In fact it would be dishonest if
such individual athletes and teams used the continental qualification system to
compete in the Olympic sports on a worldwide basis. If we allow the advantaged
sectors to qualify via the continental system, South Africa would qualify with little or
no effort in many sports because of the low development of many sports in the rest of
Africa. In fact, South Africa would qualify automatically in some sports because of the
non-existence of certain sports in the rest of Africa.
Therefore, SASCOC will focus on quality qualification and selection in its drive
towards 12 by 2012.
SASCOC SELECTION CRITERIA
Selection to London 2012 will be considered if the SASCOC Board is satisfied that
one or more of the following criteria can be fulfilled:
Entry via Preliminary Qualification:
1. If the performances and placing of the teams, individuals or combination of
athletes in the qualification competition are likely to receive the highest
commendation in international sport;
2. If the standard and level of the qualifying competition is of a very high
international quality;
Direct Entry of the Olympic Games:
1. If the individual athletes or combination of athletes can each reach the final or
level that is equated to a final in that particular sport;
2. If a team qualifies through its respective Worlds Championships or by virtue
of its winning the competition at the previous Olympic Games.
Replacement in case of Withdrawals:
On certain occasions, South Africa might be called upon to replace individuals,
combination of athletes or teams, which have withdrawn after obtaining qualification
positions in some competitions, SASCOC will not consider replacements.
CRITERIA FOR EACH SPORT
The preliminary requisites for all non-team sports seeking entry to the Olympic
Games are that athletes and/ or combination of athletes, but excluding relays, must
have:
- competed in the Federation’s National Championships in their respective
events/ immediately preceding the Olympic Games and / or;
- Competed in the World Championship or its elimination competitions officially
representing South Africa, in their respective even/s immediately preceding
the Olympic Games.
In the past, some athletes and teams have refused to accept the entry criteria and
have made unwarranted and unjustified representations to government and other
sources for inclusion in the Olympic Team. Any athlete (this includes the athlete’s
and team’s manager, coach, parent or guardian) making such representation/s will
deemed guilty of bringing the sport into disrepute and appropriate action will be taken
against such athlete/team. However, recourse to appropriate representation is
provided for in Rule 49 of the Olympic Charter.